Health equity a moral and economic imperative disruptive women in health care us futures exchanges

.

Growing up the 7 th and much-planned child of a newly remarried physician father and college-educated, homemaker mother, I had many unearned advantages and opportunities not afforded to my elder siblings the binary lab. My younger brother and myself were born during times of prosperity and opportunity. A blended family, one could speculate on the biological and genetic differences that contributed to disparate paths among the children, and a full discussion of the multi-determined factors that contribute to “success” in parenting is beyond the scope of this article. What I’d like to invite you to consider, is my premise that striving towards health equity is both a moral and economic imperative us stock market today. In my attempt to unite disparate political perspectives, I propose that whether you resonate most with the value of fairness or competition the idea of health equity should be a shared vision.


Finally, I suggest that rather than a set of “good” or “wise” ideas, the goal of health equity is an imperative that the United States in particular must uphold and demonstrate leadership in attaining.

Equipped with my upbringing and childhood experiences, individual talents, birth order advantages, and adaptive capacities, I engaged the adult world as a member of a racial minority and as a woman. These attributes were often the first influence on how others perceived me. However I subjectively interpreted life events (both objectively positive and negative) through the unique lens that combined individual and system level factors. Why is this important? As I attempted to understand and make meaning of the life trajectories of those around me in my immediate family it allowed a thought experiment binary to hexadecimal calculator. What made me different? Why were certain things easier for me? How did I find myself in favored positions? This line of questioning led me to consider issues of justice and fairness that many have eloquently elucidated in the health care reform debate process. However, unfair advantages do not fully account for my trajectory. I did work hard and exert effort to overcome obstacles. I later faced a life threatening injury and continued on my path to medical school despite partial paralysis and “losing” much of what I had work towards in life up to that point rmb conversion to usd. This conflict over individual effort vs social justice is usually where the “argument” about health equity focuses and fails hockey players club. So in order to deepen the discourse let us return to a definition.

Health is most simply defined as the state of being free from illness or injury. Equity can be defined in two ways: 1) The quality of being fair or impartial and 2) The value of the shares issued by a company. Exploring the concept of equity as the “value of shares issued by a company” we obviously are referring a specific economic term thb usd. But used as a metaphor we can imagine what have we lost as a Nation as a result of individual and social ailments. Are the social determinants of health simply a catchy way for researchers of one political perspective to exert their influence? Is there something more profound at stake? Let’s return to my family to consider the cost. My parents together bore and nurtured eight children. Some were lost for a time on the streets with addiction; others were oppressed by low societal expectations and found it difficult to meet familial expectations to “find freedom through education”, and many of us eventually found a path of sustained employment and profession. I grew up feeling that my journey seemed relatively easy, and I know all to well the cost to our family of mental and physical affliction experienced by my beloved siblings funny quotes about love and life. I am sure you can look to your own family and share in my awareness and feel that at times this “cost” is unbearable. Yet sometimes when we look at our families, and often when we engage as members of society, we attribute the “failures” of others to weakness of the individual rather than devaluation of our family (or National) worth of which we are also responsible famous quotes. We suffer economically and in collective value as a result of health inequity. In this regard, we are often kind to our point of view, but assassinate the character of those who see things differently. My hope is that I have stirred up your thinking enough to consider the foolishness of this reality and our own contribution to it. You may notice that I have not delineated the solution to health inequity here learning tutorials. Those solutions are being proposed in innovative organizations and initiatives elsewhere. What I have hoped to accomplish is an expansion of your view on health equity, and encouraged you to join in on this discussion with the conviction that we must get this one right.

Dr. Glenda Wrenn is Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychiatry at Morehouse School of Medicine (MSM) binary math. Her “disruption” in the service of others dates back to her undergraduate years at West Point, evolved to include the study of medicine at Jefferson Medical College, and has been dedicated to mental health since her residency at the Perlman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. Her health policy background was catalyzed as a Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholar at the University of Pennsylvania and she is currently promoting integrated behavioral health care policy via initiatives at the Satcher Health Leadership Institute at MSM.

Disclaimer: This article was prepared by Glenda Wrenn, MD, MSHP in her personal capacity. The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not reflect the view of Morehouse School of Medicine, the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Veterans Affairs, or the United States government.


banner