Retired noaa scientist feels slighted, sets world afire in revenge


The House Science Committee’s’ new go-to source for science. Usps shipping supplies The front page of today’s Daily Mail, in which the “ClimateGate 2” story appears. Exchange rate usd to rmb The story may be found after the sex scandal pages.

The House Science Committee today erupted in an ecstatic tweetstorm when the Daily Mail screamed this morning that “ClimateGate 2” had been uncovered: Exposed: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data:

The Mail on Sunday today reveals astonishing evidence that the organisation that is the world’s leading source of climate data rushed to publish a landmark paper that exaggerated global warming and was timed to influence the historic Paris Agreement on climate change.

A high-level whistleblower has told this newspaper that America’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) breached its own rules on scientific integrity when it published the sensational but flawed report, aimed at making the maximum possible impact on world leaders including Barack Obama and David Cameron at the UN climate conference in Paris in 2015.

The report claimed that the ‘pause’ or ‘slowdown’ in global warming in the period since 1998 – revealed by UN scientists in 2013 – never existed, and that world temperatures had been rising faster than scientists expected. Exchange rate us to canada Launched by NOAA with a public relations fanfare, it was splashed across the world’s media, and cited repeatedly by politicians and policy makers.

But the whistleblower, Dr John Bates, a top NOAA scientist with an impeccable reputation, has shown The Mail on Sunday irrefutable evidence that the paper was based on misleading, ‘unverified’ data.

His vehement objections to the publication of the faulty data were overridden by his NOAA superiors in what he describes as a ‘blatant attempt to intensify the impact’ of what became known as the Pausebuster paper.

His disclosures are likely to stiffen President Trump’s determination to enact his pledges to reverse his predecessor’s ‘green’ policies, and to withdraw from the Paris deal – so triggering an intense political row.

The scientific community is outraged, and response has been swift. What is a binary number Zeke Hausfather, climate scientist and energy systems analyst at Berkeley Earth, who worked on providing independent verification of the data Rose attacks, writes at CarbonBrief:

What [Rose] fails to mention is that the new NOAA results have been validated by independent data from satellites, buoys and Argo floats and that many other independent groups, including Berkeley Earth and the UK’s Met Office Hadley Centre, get effectively the same results.

… Convert idr to usd Rose’s claim that NOAA’s results “can never be verified” is patently incorrect, as we just published a paper independently verifying the most important part of NOAA’s results.

… Commodity futures price quotes Rose’s article presents a deeply misleading graph where he shows an arbitrary offset between NOAA’s data and the Hadley land/ocean dataset. Usd to nzd This is an artifact of the use of different baselines…This comparison ends up being spurious, because each record uses a different baseline period to define their temperature anomaly.

The ‘whistle blower’ is John Bates who was not involved in any aspect of the work… John Bates never participated in any of the numerous technical meetings on the land or marine data I have participated in at NOAA NCEI either in person or remotely. Euro dollar exchange rate chart This shows in his reputed (I am taking the journalist at their word that these are directly attributable quotes) mis-representation of the processes that actually occured. Us futures market live In some cases these mis-representations are publically verifiable.

The [global warming] “pause” is based on bad statistics and cherry-picking a specific period, which is bad “science”. Usd aud exchange rate With good statistics, there is no evidence of any trend change.

Rose gets some suggestive quotes from an apparently disgruntled retired NOAA employee. 1 usd to malaysian ringgit The quotes themselves seem to be likely inconsequential procedural complaints, the corresponding insinuations seem to come from Rose.

… Futures markets explained It sounds as if he made a set of procedures for his climate satellite data, which he really liked, and wanted other groups in NOAA to use it as well. Usd to aud converter Was frustrated when others did not prioritize enough updating their existing procedures to his.

Each of the above scientists then proceeds to patiently and factually rebut Rose’s and Bates’ claims, point by point, graph by graph. Usd to ringgit I encourage you to check out the links to see what the debate is about.

But there seems little point in the general public debating the scientific details. Best used bookstores nyc And it’s probably not the priority. Python xml Scientists were also refuting Bates’ claims in detail on c limate change contrarian Judith Curry ’s blog, where Bates personally posted his arguments. Binary file download But commenter “cerescokid” broke through in frustration and summarized the dark magnitude of the situation perfectly… and ominously:

The story and the 2nd and 3rd derivative of the story is that a whistleblower, from the inside and not just any whistleblower but one fro the epicenter of the climate establishment. Cad to usd converter This has more significance, not scientifically, but public perception wise than anything that Judith or Pielke or Lindzencan say. Hex to binary converter Bates is from the government.

This is going to be a seminal moment because of the headline value. Binary code reader Every skeptic, politician or otherwise, will get their 15 minutes of fame, again not because of the actual issues surrounding what Bates has said but rather who has come out from the shadows. Famous quotes about friendship The original story will get lost. Picture format converter The future stories will be the great divergence between what the climate establishment really knows versus what they they think they know. Gbp to usd exchange rate history And that is Judith’s uncertainty monster.

Anyone who thinks this is about Rose or about the specifics of Bates statements doesn’t understand the dynamics that will overtake what is being discussed here. Binary editor Talk about chaos theory.

I agree, this is a seminal moment. Usd to inr history How appropriate it comes to us via the Daily Mail, which pull-no-punches RationalWiki describes as “a reactionary, neo-fascist tabloid rag masquerading as “traditional values.”

David Rose has a long history of writing discredited articles for the Daily Mail for years attacking climate scientists. Gold chart 1 year The UK National Weather Service has been forced to repeatedly debunk his claims. Pounds to us dollars converter Columbia Journalism Review describes Rose’s work as “outrageous” “pseudoscience.” Rose is so known for this garbage that Discover Magazine dubbed an award for bad science reporting the “David Rose Award, thanks to his “flawed and distorted climate reporting.” In 2013, Media Matters named the Daily Mail “Climate Change Misinformer Of The Year,” noting that its claims had been repeated by U.S. Binary multiplication Congressmen and dozens of U.S. Call option price formula news outlets.

When it comes to climate science reporting, the Mail on Sunday and Telegraph are only reliable in the sense that you can rely on them to usually get the science wrong… Based on their history of shoddy reporting, the safest course of action when reading a climate article in the Mail on Sunday or Telegraph is to assume they’re misrepresentations or falsehoods until you can verify the facts therein for yourself.

The highly respected American Geophysical Union, on whose board Bates once sat, rebuked Bates for taking his data management concerns to a tabloid, refuted some of Bates’ and Rose’s claims, and linked to two of the above scientific rebuttals:

As to the merits – or lack thereof – of the allegations made in John Bates’ post about data mismanagement, within NOAA, that discussion is and will continue to unfold in dialogue among scientists, such as in this article by Zeke Hausfather from Berkeley Earth and this blog post from the Irish Climate Analysis and Research Units.

AGU believes that the merits of the Karl et al. Usd to sgd conversion (2015) should be and have been discussed in appropriate peer-reviewed scientific journals. Usa today sudoku answers We note that the main results of that study have since been independently replicated by later work. Binary worksheet In the meantime, we will continue to stand up for the credibility of climate science, the freedom of scientists to conduct and communicate their science.

… Fx rate gbp to usd We are closely monitoring how this will play out among policymakers and influencers. Usd to myr exchange rate For example, U.S. Future stock market crash House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space, and Technology issued a misleading press release. Canadian dollar to usd These types of statements by policymakers that attempt to take one study/dispute and blow it out of proportion are both unhelpful and misleading. Rs to us dollar We will be working with the science committee to demonstrate the scientific consensus on climate change and to encourage them not to interfere with the scientific process.

Rose is so delusional he managed to find validation in the AGU’s response, tweeting “AGU is taking John Bates’s revelation that NOAA breached its own data rules with Pausebuster paper seriously.”

All materials are found on open spaces of a network the Internet as freely extended and laid out exclusively in the fact-finding purposes. If you are what lawful legal owner or a product and against its placing on the given site, inform us and we will immediately remove the given material. The administration of a site does not bear responsibility for actions of the visitors breaking copyrights.